dimanche 8 juillet 2018

The Role of Cultural Marxism in the Pit Bull Problem

Charles Danten, former veterinarian


The liberals that are presently occupying our universities and our public institutions are wrong about almost everything they preach. The only way they can sustain themselves in power is through mass media corruption, propaganda, authoritarianism, intimidation, political correctness, censorship, and persecution of dissidents. 


***
All the bogus ideas on race, behaviour, and egalitarianism, which are used as arguments by pro pit bull advocates such as, Anne-Marie Goldwater, as well as by the liberals in power who voted against the pit bull ban in Quebec, are Cultural Marxist ideas (see below what Ron Paul thinks of Cultural Marxism). 



This Jewish-led ideology (see Further reading section below), that was born in the head of several egotistical crackpots such as Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, Antonio Gramsci, Georg Lukacs, William Reich, Herbert Marcuse, Israel Ehrenburg (Ashley Montague), Eric Fromm, and Franz Boaz of the Frankfurt School, is partially transposed almost word for word on pit bulls as if they were human beings. 

destructive effect on White countries.
THIS  VIDEO WAS CENSORED BY YOUTUBE

According to this credo, breeds (races in humans) and behaviour are social constructs. In plain language, this means that the 450 breeds or so of dogs don't exist and that agression, for example, having no biological basis, is strictly a matter of training. Since there are no bad dogs, only bad masters, it is therefore unfair to judge a dog by its looks (I dare not say breed because according to globalist pro-pit bull advocates, there is no such thing as a breed, the equivalent of race for humans). Deniers are called racists or hate-mongers.” (See also on this blog, the anti-hate-speech propaganda of the pro-pit bull advocates.)


Multiculturalism, diversity, socialism, liberalism, and progress are other words for this highly toxic communist ideology. The creators of cultural marxism insisted on the need to hide the real purpose of their project under the cover of innocent and positive sounding words, respectability, and science.”  

This is covert communism or bolshevism at its best. What awaits us at the end when these demented people are in total control are gulags, mass assassinations, confiscation of private property, etc. The Russians who rejected this ideology know all about it. 

The end goal of Cultural Marxism is to erase the borders between nations, cultures, sexes, races, and species. Its enforcers want a one-size-fits-all world government and culture composed of a mongrelized dumbed-down easy to manipulate population whose only goal in life is to buy useless goods or to get intoxicated by various mood enhancing drugs such as porno, sodomy, pedophilia, zoophilia, marijuana, alcohol, opioids, high calorie food, pets, etc. Total degeneracy is the end goal and we're pretty much there.

Below is a good overview by Paul Joseph Watson of the cultural marxist paradise” Jews would like to impose on the whole world: A shit-stained, drug soaked, degenerate, morose, despondent, perms-drizzle freak show. Capital of Antifa, capital of sexual deviancy, capital of depression - in  short, another progressive Utopia.” 



Jewish-Made-La-La-Land

This globalist project is forced on the public in a stealth fashion by social engineering through books, mainstream media, movies, TV series and sit-coms, and government propaganda. If pets need to be promoted, for example, most sit-coms will have one, or movies will be made that highlight the vastly exaggerated wonders of the human-animal bond.

Schools and universities which are disproportionally staffed with Jewish-cultural-marxist-ideologues play a huge role in the spreading of this poisonous ideology. Even pre-school children are being brainwashed. By the time these kids finish university, they hate themselves to the point of wanting to destroy their own kind.


Karl Marx destroying your kids with his poison

In the end, does anyone have the right, asks Harvard historian, Richard Pipes, in the closing arguments of his book, Russia Under the Bolshevik Regimeto remake human beings and refashion society without the mandate of the people and even against its will in the spirit of the early communist slogan:  We will drive mankind to happiness by force. ’ 

According to Kant, writes Richard Pipes, man must never be a means to an end, but an end in himself. 

Modern society, concludes Professor Pipes, is a complicated structure difficult to grasp, so one should never impose on it patterns of conduct. [...] It is best to let people be. The tragic and sordid story of communism teaches that political authority must never be employed for ideological reasons.

***

To sacrifice a civilization, a nation, a race, and a people for some far out utopia created by a few narcissistic out of touch people who couldn’t care less about those they are using to create their Garden of Eden is not only unethical but criminal. The scum bags who are trying to force this ideology down the throat of their own citizens should be put on trial for treason.


Traitor and soros-manipulated-cultural-marxist-simpleton, Justin Trudeau, 
with his Sudanese-refugee-minister-of-immigration who wasn't even born in Canada, wants one million more third-world migrants before 2020, on top of the illegal 
and legal migrants that are already coming into the country.

Take the racial question, for example, the cultural marxist's pet issue: The out of Africa theory they impose on us as a scientifically proven truth is false. Modern man as we know him today did not originate from a single modern black race originating in Africa, which then spread all over the world. 

Races evolved separately, in isolation, in different parts of the world and at different times. The psychological and physical characteristics, which make each race so beautifully unique, were developed over thousands of years in response to the environmental conditions to which each race was exposed. 


Prophetic French book on the migrant invasion
from the Third World, first published in 1973
and republished since, more than 23 times. Yet few 
people know about it as the MSM ignores it completely.

As says Jean Raspail in his book, The Camp of the Saints
Man has never loved the whole of humanity in one bloc, all races, religions, and cultures as one, but only those that he recognizes as belonging to his own kind, those of his group, no matter how vast it is. For the rest, he forces himself to love everyone and he has been forced to do so, and in the end, when the evil has been done, there will be nothing left of him.

Those who love their own kind the most are the ones that will come out on top. That's the way it is my friend and there's nothing we can do about it, it's in our DNA.



Further Readings

Flowerman, Samuel H. (Oct 1977). Mass  propaganda and the war against bigotry. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 42 (4), 429-439.  For those who think that cultural marxism is an antisemite conspiracy theory, this article from the Jewish subversive who masterminded the corruption and undermining of the American people will set you free. 

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D. (September 25, 2018). Modify the standards of the in-group: On Jews and Mass Communications — Parts I & II. Occidental Observer.  Dr Joyce debunks the conspiracy theory argument used by the Great Destroyers of our culture.

Heinze, Andrew R (2004). Jews and The American Soul. Human Nature in the 20th century. Princeton University Press. The influence of Jews on the progressive movements in the United-States which have destroyed American culture.

MacDonald, Kevin (2002). The Culture of Critique. An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth Century Intellectual and Political Movements1st Books Library. California University Professor, Kevin MacDonald, writes an academic, well-referenced, and soft-spoken book on the destruction of America’s traditional culture by Jewish-led Cultural Marxists.

Murray, Charles (2020). Human Diversity. The Biology of Gender, race, and Class. TWELVE. All race deniers and the like must read this book. 

Pipes, Richard (1995). Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime. Vintage Books. Russians know all about marxism. It killed 30 million Russians.

Plomin, Robert (2018). Blueprint. How DNA makes us who we are. Allen Lane. If you think behaviour has nothing to do with biology, you have to read this book by the world's leading behavioural geneticist.

Raspail, Jean and Norman R. Shapiro (1994). The Camp of the Saints. Social Contract PR (first published in 1973).

Robertson, Wilmot (1972). The Dispossessed Majority. Howard Allen. The effect of cultural marxism on our culture. A real eye-opener available on the Internet.





vendredi 6 juillet 2018

The Pit Bull Problem. A Few Root Causes

Charles Danten, former veterinarian


Financial and Commercial Interests


Some people, such as Harvard's Steven Pinker, explain the current pet fad by a growing compassion for animals and humans. Others, like the author of this article, see in this animal madness erroneous beliefs dating back to the 19th century, when it was falsely believed, that a relationship with a pet could improve the moral and spiritual fibre of mankind. 


American child psychiatrist, Boris Levinson, the instigator of Animal Assisted Therapy (AAT), consecrated these false notions into “science” in the sixties. The pet industry, sniffing a golden opportunity to improve business used this pseudoscience to stimulate the demand for pets and the sale of goods and services. Their marketing campaign was a huge success. Today, one out of two households has one or more animals, and America, and most Western countries, have literally gone pet crazy. (1)

Just to give you an idea of the scope of this marketing success, in America, the pet industry is the eighth in importance of the retail trade; it is larger than that of toys, hardware, and jewellery. According to the American Association of Pet Products, its annual turnover went from 17 billion USD in 1994 to 63 billion USD in 2016. (2)




Veterinarians, Big Pharma, psychologists, psychiatrists, sociologists, AAT researchers, animal protection NGOs, such as PETA, humane societies, pounds, shelters, animal rights' lawyers and jurists, animal media, film industry, steel industries that produce cans for pet food, agribusiness and fisheries who find in this outlet opportunities for their by-products, rendering plants that provide dead animals for pet food manufacturers, makers of pet paraphernalia, trainers, breeders, dealers, smugglers, poachers, groomers, dog walkers, five-star hotels and restaurants for pets, homeopaths, fortune tellers, wig makers, funeral homes, cemeteries, distributors, drivers, supermarkets, super-pet shops and dog shops whose “sole purpose is to sell animals and nothing  else, as if they were selling furniture,” jumped on the bandwagon behind veterinarians and pet food manufacturers, the big winners of this economic bonanza. (3)(4)




Knowing this, it is easier to understand why this industry is so scared of breed-specific legislation for pit bulls. If it should extend to other breeds of biters as well as to their crosses, this would be a terrible blow to the industry. In this business, profit is directly dependent on the size of the animal. Even if they are less numerous than cats... dogs – and the bigger they are the better – are indeed the most profitable of all pets. (5)


Veterinary bias


“The latest studies,” writes journalist Marie-Claude Malboeuf of the newspaper, La Presse“find one after the other that pit bulls are overrepresented among dogs responsible for injuries. However, the report of the Quebec Veterinary Association, cites four of the studies in question, but sometimes omits the most significant passages of the said studies. [...] The 2011 study - spanning 15 years, on the most severe cases treated at a Texas hospital - becomes almost contradictory. The surgeons, who wrote this study, state that pit bulls have proved more deadly than other dogs; caused more heavy or deep comas. And sent patients to intensive care for the longest time. ‘Regulation of pit bulls could substantially reduce the rate of deaths from dog bites, conclude these researchers.’ ”


Dr. Suzie Price, President of the Quebec
Corporation of Veterinarians

“But instead of stating the foregoing in their report to the Government, veterinarians write the following,” writes Ms. Malbeuf: ‘the proportion of victims requiring a surgical operation was identical regardless of the dog: pit bull or another breed.’ In this report,” continues Ms. Malboeuf, “veterinarians criticize ‘serious gaps’ in data compiled by the victims, but totally support false studies compiled by the paid-for-hire scientists of the National Canine Research Council on behalf of a millionaire pro-pit bull advocacy group, Animal Farm Foundation. “According to the report of the Veterinary Association,” concludes Ms. Malbeuf, “targeting certain breeds would only calm the population and would run counter to scientific and demographic studies carried out in recent years.” (6)

According to his professional oath of allegiance, the social duty of the veterinarian is firstly to do everything in his power to defend the interests of the public, and secondly, to relieve the suffering of animals. However, veterinarians currently working in the field of pets no longer fulfil their duty by putting their interests and those of their clients above those of the public. Needless to say, honest veterinarians, and there are many of them, do not condone this attitude and feel quite demoralized by it. 
Here is the Canadian veterinary oath: 
As a member of the veterinary medical profession, I solemnly swear that I will use my scientific knowledge and skills for the benefit of society. I will strive to promote animal health and welfare, relieve animal suffering, protect the health of the public and environment, and advance comparative medical knowledge.I will practise my profession conscientiously, with dignity, and in keeping with the principles of veterinary medical ethics. I will strive continuously to improve my professional knowledge and competence and to maintain the highest professional and ethical standards for myself and the profession.


Wishful Thinking


If lack of training, inadequate or insufficient training has a lot to do with biting, especially if biting inhibition is left out of the training scheme, inadequate care or surveillance also has a significant impact on behaviour. 

Badly socialized and poorly fed animals, those that are left alone for much of the day, those that lack exercise, those suffering from boredom and various psychological and physiological pathologies caused by domestication, such as the diseases stemming from the emotional dependence (separation anxiety) are real time bombs. 

Quebec's law B-3.1 (art.8) requires that owners of a dog provide the latter with “stimulation, socialization opportunities, or environmental enrichments that suit its biological needs,” but who is responsible for enforcing this law? Do we have the personnel and the technical means required to enforce it in every house, street and Park? Not likely.  (7) 

In the end, these recommendations full of good intentions amount to wishful thinking or as skeptics would say, "the price vice pays-to virtue." While we wait for the change that will finally wipe out dog bites, sometime in the far future, at an unspecified date, it's business as usual. 


Discussion


The elimination of the fighting pit bull works. Don’t believe those who claim otherwise. It is also false to claim that breed-specific legislation does not work because banned dogs will be replaced by another dog breed just as aggressive as soon as they are taken off the market. Pit bull bylaws exist since the 80s and no dog, wherever these laws exist, has even come close to replacing this ultimate killing machine. A pit bull can shred to pieces and tear apart a 200 lbs. mastiff before you know it. No other dog can do this. In other words, it is wrong and dangerous to let these born killers off the hook on the pretext that others will follow anyways. We don’t do this for humans and we should not do it for dogs either. 

Statistics are meaningful and we should strive to compile them with more accuracy for all dog bites, but what makes them so meaningful is their capacity to bring forth the extreme severity and extent of the injuries caused by the pit bulls and the unpredictability of their attacks. This should be one of the main guiding principles when deciding if a breed should be banned, even more important than the frequency of bites. 

It is essential to collect valid data on the population of breeds, the number of bite incidents, the severity of the bite injury, as well as the breeds responsible. To do this, we need to lift the professional secrecy of veterinarians in order to oblige them to report the aggressive dogs they see in their practice. It should also be mandatory for owners to register their pets and their breed without exception when they buy a pet, sign a lease, buy a house or fill in their income tax form. All veterinarians, doctors, police officers, and other stakeholders everywhere should be required to report bites and to identify the breed of the biter with a cell phone picture. These statistics must be available to the public on demand at any time or posted on a website for all to see.


Knowing all along that regardless of the measures taken, it is impossible to eradicate biting dogs without addressing the root causes listed above and in the other articles on this blog. 

Society must choose between lying for business and ideological reasons and telling the truth in order to protect the public, animals, and the environment. 

About the author

Dr. Charles Danten has university degrees in agronomy (BSC), veterinary medicine (DVM), and translation (MA). Dr. Danten worked as a veterinarian for 18 years, 10 of which in his own practice.


Further Readings


Danten, Charles (2015). Slaves of Our Affection. The Myth of the Happy Pet. Available on Amazon. Debunks the pet culture and the claimed benefits of pets. 

Ewen, Stuart  (2001). Captains of Consciousness. Advertising and the Social Roots of the Consumer Culture. 25th Anniversary Edition. How traditional family ties were destroyed for commercial reasons.

West, Patrick (2002). Conspicuous Compassion: Why Sometimes It Really Is Cruel to Be Kind. Civitas. The price vice pays to virtue.

References


1. Charles Danten (2015). Slaves of Our Affection. The Myth of the Happy Pet. Amazon.

2. Pet Industry Market Size & Ownership Statistics. American Pet Products Association.

3. Jean-Luc Vadakarn (1998). Parle à mon chien ma tête est malade. Albin Michel.

4. Stuart Ewen (2014). La société de l'indécence. Publicité et genèse de la société de consommation. Éditions le retour aux sources.

5. Pet Industry Market Size & Ownership Statistics. Article cited.

6. Marie-Claude Malbœuf. La Presse

7. Patrick West (2002). Conspicuous Compassion: Why Sometimes It Really Is Cruel to Be Kind. Civitas.